The University of North Texas is sponsoring an annual symposium on topics relevant to Open Access initiatives:
Warning: Be careful if you use a search engine to locate the Oregon criminal record check site, rather than drilling down from the most recent OSP homepage. Old versions of the page and instructions are still showing up in Google and other web browser searches. Make sure you are looking at the most recent instructions. As of today, instructions were dated February 2015.
Disclaimer: It is against state law for library staff members to engage in any conduct that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law (ORS 9.160, 9.166 and 9.21). They may not interpret statutes, cases or regulations, perform legal research, recommend or assist in the preparation of forms, or advise patrons regarding their legal rights. They may, however, assist patrons in locating materials or links that would aid in individual research.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is for research purposes only. We do not provide legal advice, nor do we endorse any person, product, or company.
If you’ve not been following the news about the University of Oregon archives “leak,” now is the time to start catching up.
“Library workers under scrutiny for leak of 22,000 UO documents: Meanwhile, documents leaked to a professor were not returned by the UO’s deadline,” by Diane Dietz, The Register-Guard, Jan. 23, 2015
The Oregonian and the Register Guard have been posting stories. So has U of O blogger, Professor Harbaugh, at his UO Matters: The Unofficial Organ of the University of Oregon blog, which has links to the news stories.
Make sure you know and understand all the facts, and the relevant law, before jumping to any conclusions. Remember:
“The lesson of that first day in kindergarten was re-taught to me throughout my life: If you think you’re pretty smart, you’re not talking to enough people.” Cameron, Bruce, “The Smartest Guy in an Empty Room,” Funny Times, September 2013, p. 3.
The Oregon Attorney General’s 2014 Public Records and Meetings Manual is available for viewing and purchase. (The last edition was published in 2011.)
Please visit the ODOJ website for information on downloading and ordering options.
Politwoops: “Deleted Doesn’t Mean Inaccessible: Search and Access Deleted Tweets By Politicians,” from the 4/29/13 LJ InfoDocket post by Gary Price.
(Priceless Meanderings: Diamonds are Forever (Fleming & Bond) and Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend (Loos and Monroe) and Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (Lennon and McCarthy) and Tweety Bird (of course!).)
Update: See “Oregon Supreme Court will tackle MERS foreclosure issues,” by Brent Hunsberger, The Oregonian, July 19, July 20 (print edition), 2012.
For the decision AND an overview of Oregon’s nonjudicial foreclosure laws:
Rebecca Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC (A147430) (from Clackamas County Circuit Court)
“In Oregon, a trustee may foreclose a trust deed by advertisement and sale–also known as nonjudicial foreclosure–only if the beneficiary of the trust deed has publicly recorded “any assignments of the trust deed” in the county mortgage records. Today the Court of Appeals held that using Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems, Inc. (MERS) as the nominal “beneficiary” and its private database for tracking beneficial interests in trust deeds does not satisfy the public recording requirement of Oregon’s nonjudicial foreclosure law….” [Link to full case.]
Link to the full case: Rebecca Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC