Articles Posted in

Published on:

By

Just when I thought I’d posted my last pre-holiday blog entry (Shalom!), I visited Shlep and found that David (agita-avoidance shield UP 🙂 had an update on grandparent visitation rights. Among others, David links in his 12/21 posting to the Fausey v. Hiller U.S. Supreme Court petition for cert.

In Oregon, O’Donnell-Lamont was the recent grandparent legal rights blockbuster case (and the first set of appellate briefs we digitized in our now-dormant digital briefs project). Also here in Oregon we have “Oregon’s Legal Guide for Grandparents and Other Relatives Raising Children.”

Published on:

By

From Oregonlive, here:

“Forest Grove’s attempt to condemn 140 acres of farmland just outside its border came to an abrupt halt Thursday when Washington County Circuit Judge Mark Gardner dismissed the case without prejudice and encouraged both parties to try mediation. Although the dismissal ends the current condemnation case, the city has the option of refiling it, Gardner said. Mediation is expected to start after the holidays, according to attorneys for the city and the property owners….

Gardner said after Thursday’s hearing ended that he thought the case wasn’t a good match for the limits of a courtroom, where there is always a winner and a loser. He listened to a day and a half of testimony before suggesting mediation as an alternative. “In a mediation, there’s all kinds of possibilities in terms of how people might structure a resolution,” he said.”

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

I don’t know if any of you caught this editorial in today’s Oregonian – or if you caught the libraries reference, but it did make me laugh. How often do you see library workers mentioned in the same sentence with stockbrokers, skiers, and mountain climbers. This might be the first, though a bittersweet context it is.

“Some of us work in libraries. Some sell stocks. Some ski. Some climb mountains.” (from: 12/22/06 Oregonian, editorial:

Enjoy the long weekend – and don’t spend it all shopping. Spare a thought for families who are missing loved ones who will never return.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

From a place where Crown Copyright reigns supreme, we now have this wonderful public database of U.K. Statutes. Our roots are here, or should I say there, so pay attention. There are times when you really do want to look at and compare their statutes to ours. Try, for example, typing “infanticide” into the database title search field. (Thanks to Rob at BoleyBlogs for the posting about this database.)

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

From State v Meharry (S52988) OJD Media Release: “In an opinion written by Justice Rives Kistler, the Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of an automobile does not violate Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution when the automobile is mobile at the time an officer stops it and there is probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime. The Court reasoned that the search of defendant’s van was justified because the van was mobile when the officer stopped it by parking his police car behind defendant’s van.”

This Oregon Supreme Court case and others decided this week can be found at the OJD web site, here. The full text of Meharry is here.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

What do investigators and truck drivers have in common? Just as in this age of wired shoppers, we still need skillful truck drivers to deliver the goods, so too do wired attorneys still need skilled investigators on the ground. It might be a wired world, but we still eat, shop, and cheat in three tangible dimensions. It’s a career choice for many, electronically– or gumshoe-inclined, and law librarians have moved into the profession too. I remember a wonderful presentation at a law librarian conference by a Kroll lawyer/investigator not so many years ago. He was also doing a bit of recruiting, and not a few of us were intrigued by the possibilities. Lucky for you, some of us stayed in public service 🙂

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

See this Oregon Court of Appeals case, State v Rowe, Docket no. A128400. From the OJD Media Release page (use drop-down menu to get to the Ct of App):

Defendant appeals his convictions for impeding traffic, ORS 811.130, and failure to obey a police officer, ORS 811.535. Defendant was standing next to his bicycle on a sidewalk in Portland when he refused a police officer’s order to “move along.” Held: To be convicted of impeding traffic, defendant had to have been “riding a bicycle.” To be convicted of failure to obey, the officer’s order had to have been lawful. On appeal, the state concedes that it failed to prove that defendant was riding a bicycle. Further, the state concedes that no other lawful basis existed for the officer to have ordered defendant to move. Reversed.”

Published on:

By

Shlep has a post (from 12/18) with lots of good links on the subject, “holiday hell week at family courts.” Let’s hope not, but … prepare for some heartbreak. We provide law library services to a lot of local juvenile and family law attorneys – it’s a tough job, not unlike walking a tightrope high above a canyon, with a child in each arm.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

OSB recently published 2006 revisions to their “Creditors’ Rights and Remedies” and “Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instructions” CLE manuals/deskbooks (could I start a movement to STOP calling them CLEs and start calling them, maybe, practice guides or something like that? We all get a little testy after the 43,598th time saying, “the MANUAL, you know, the DESKBOOK, you know, the LOOSELEAF, NOT the CLE coursebook.’ Sigh.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information