Articles Posted in

Published on:

By

From Elizabeth E. Welch, Esq.:

We are having a Free Legal Consultation Day here at KOHLHOFF & WELCH. The details are:
February 9, 2007
KOHLHOFF & WELCH
Attorneys at Law
A Mother Daughter Partnership
5828 North Lombard
Portland, Oregon 97203
503.286.7178

The consultations are for a half hour, any further representation by mutual agreement only. Spaces are available from 9 to 5. Some are filled already and we anticipate full capacity–first come first serve!”

For more about Kohlhoff & Welch, see here and here.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Interesting posting (which does not mean I agree with it, so perhaps I should say, “provocative” post) at FutureLawyer about LegalZoom (direct link to LegalZoom, here):

“LegalZoom is an Internet site that allows consumers to create legal documents online, without the assistance of a lawyer. I will leave to the future the wisdom of this; except to say that lawyers who don’t use technology will not be able to compete. We need to offer legal advice AND document drafting at a competitive price, or we will not have to worry about law practice anymore. It will be gone. There is no subsitute for a competent lawyer’s advice. However, we need to give the public value, or they will go elsewhere.”

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Who knew! Thanks to Isaac Laquedem we learn that Oregon’s Legislative Counsel has a sense of humor (not that we didn’t love their work already :-). Visit their ORS web site or link to it through Isaac Laquedem’s posting on the “Healing Power of Oregon Law …”

“Just having this extraordinarily impressive-looking set in your office will make you smarter and even more attractive.* …

*Sentences marked with an asterisk are probably not at all true. Contact the Office of the Legislative Counsel with your questions and complaints. “

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Lawyers for two cases that originated in Oregon appeared before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, 1/16/07, to discuss the finer points of insurance law. Saveco v Burr (06-84) and Geico v Edo (06-100).

Today’s Oregonian (1/17/07) ran a story about the cases in the print edition on page two, but the story seems to have escaped their online edition. Maybe it will show up eventually. (Jeff Kosseff of the Oregonian wrote it.) Maybe we can blame the snow and ice (it seems as if little else is in the news in the Portland metro area). Ross Runkel has a useful summary of these insurance cases and links to supporting documents. (Thanks, Ross!). And don’t forget law blogger, David Rossmiller for other insurance law news.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The Thurgood Marshall Law Law (always dear to my heart – they hired me when I was a wet behind the ears, newly hatched law librarian, and nurtured me kindly, patiently, and with much skill) has on their web site this database: “Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.”

“In conjunction with the Thurgood Marshall Law Library’s strategic plan to enhance its civil rights collection in support of the School of Law’s teaching and research mission, the Library has worked since 2001 to create a complete electronic record of United States Commission on Civil Rights publications held in the Library’s collection and available on the USCCR Web site. The publications are made available over the Internet as page image presentations in PDF format. Each item is linked to the appropriate bibliographic record in the Catalog. Publications are also searchable by keyword and accessible by date and title.”

Links from beSpacific and Law-Lib (the law librarian listserve)

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

“I’m My Own Grandpa.” Remember the song? (Link to versions of it here, here, and the Wikipedia entry, here.) Well, small town law librarianship is not unlike the song. You might work half time as the town law librarian and half time for the public defender whose aunt works half time for the sheriff whose chief deputy is the town’s part-time prosecutor, who also happens to work 10 hours a week as the city solicitor. Her husband works part time as county counsel and part time in private practice. Their son is in law school and their daughter used to practice corporate law but came back to her hometown to practice juvenile law. Her husband is a Justice of the Peace, part time of course, and runs the local coffee shop/internet café the rest of the time with the their two kids, one of whom is nothing but trouble. The other works in the law library, after school and a couple hours a month doing odd jobs for the bail bondsman.

Now, you’re the law librarian and all of these people somehow ended up involved in one way or another caught up with the same lawsuit and they are now all showing up in the law library to do research. You can’t leave town and you darn well better know how to keep your own counsel.
This is a little bit exaggerated, though I bet there are some small town law librarians out there who would say, no not in the least – you didn’t go far enough. You left out Uncle Nunzio who blew into town after living in NYC for 23 years, the high school art teacher who was in love with Uncle Nunzio when they were in high school together, her current husband who is co-owner of the company building the new landfill over on the west side of town, his sister who thinks her kids are addled due to wastewater that’s been leaking from the old landfill, etc., etc., etc.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The latest Bedsworth (Justice William W. Bedsworth) is out and you won’t want to miss it. Who knew being a judge could be so much fun, though fun might not really be the word to use. Nu?

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

I’m an unabashed fan of the AARP Bulletin. (This is different from being uncritical of some of AARP’s positions.) I learn as much, and sometimes about the same things, as I do reading Consumer Reports. This month (Jan 2007) in the AARP Bulletin their column, The Law, has this question: “Does a retirement community violate federal laws by deciding what kind of living arrangements residents need?” The online edition doesn’t yet have a live link to the story, but it is listed in the table of contents. Apparently there has been a lawsuit filed in California, by the plaintiff, Herriot and AARP, against Channing House in Palo Alto. Another story about this lawsuit is here.

The AARP Bulletin also has this column, Ask the Experts, and questions about law, finance, and government are answered.

And, they also have a legal services network, which I will add to my growing “How to Find a Lawyer” list I am compiling for my upcoming programs on the subject.

Contact Information