Articles Posted in State Government & Legal Resources

Published on:

By

Researching legislative history can sometimes require more than plowing through dusty hearing transcripts. Guides to legislative history and intent always suggest searching the secondary literature, e.g. newspaper and journal articles that are written before the legislation is passed, shortly thereafter, and reflective articles long after the law has been enacted:

Willamette Law Review (Winter 2008, vol. 45, no. 2) has this Comment:

The Battle Over Property Rights in Oregon: Measures 37 and 40 and the Need for Sustainable Land Use Planning,” by David J. Boulanger.

Published on:

By

If you think federalism means that in the United States the federal government operates independently of state government, or vice versa, see this blog post for an interesting civics lesson:

Isaac Laquedem’s take: Harry Reid gives Kate Brown an unexpected power over the United States Senate

Published on:

By

It should and you can always refuse to do business with them if they don’t (and put it in writing, please). But that’s too easy. There needs to be legislation requiring them to do this!

For a public policy wonk there are few things more fun than watching the Bills Go By. Visit the Oregon Legislature’s web pages to all sorts of bill searching options. Then you can track its path through Committees, Committee hearings, reports (e.g. these), floor votes, and maybe even a Governor’s signature.

Here’s a bill on requiring car repair estimates: 2009 HB 2268

Published on:

By

Links to Previous Bites can be found here at, “Oregon Consitution in Small Bites: So Far

Today: Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #14 (Article IV, Legislative Department, Sections 2-6, copied from this version at the Oregon Legislature’s website)

ARTICLE IV
LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT

… (previous sections found in this Small Bite)

Published on:

By

Lots of people think that answers to legal question are online. Hah!

Law librarians and lawyer know that few, if any, answers to legal “questions” are “online.” “Laws” are online (e.g. the ORS), but answers to legal problems are not; answers require research, study, synthesis, conclusions, negotiation, more research, study, and great leaps of faith, not to mention luck. (An appellate attorney in the family doesn’t hurt either, especially one who owes you a favor.)

This question, about vacating property, we got the other day, along with about a zillion other bankruptcy, foreclosure, interest rate, credit card, and debt related questions. Welcome to 2009.

Published on:

By

I read an interesting story in the National Law Journal (12/22/08, vol. 31, no. 17, p.1) about special state courts just for veterans. It’s free on their website (thank you NLJ!):

Courts for veterans spreading across U.S.: Wave of vets in courts trips alarm,” by Lynne Marek, December 22, 2008:

Excerpt: “State criminal courts devoted to U.S. war veterans are emerging across the country, from New York to Oklahoma to California, as increasing numbers of soldiers returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are showing up as defendants with a special set of problems.

Published on:

By

1) The Oregon Constitution has been wikified, but not just here (or the Ballotpedia version or this Indopedia version) but also by the good people at WikiProject Oregon who are wikifiing the Oregon Constitution, creating a Wikisource edition.

2) How to Find the Most Current Additions to the Oregon Constitution:

a) Given our rather interesting (you can’t make me use those other adjectives that spring to mind) system of amending the Oregon Constitution, I thought a few remarks on finding the most current version of the Oregon Constitution might be in order:

b) The version at the Oregon Legislature’s website does not now (as of this date) include changes to the Constitution made in Special Sessions. For example, as of today, the Oregon Legislature’s Constitution is dated 2007. However … there were changes in the 2008 Special Session.

Published on:

By

My previous post, Ayyoub, Clackamas County (Oregon) Blogging Case, and SCRIBD, did not identify the documents that I uploaded to SCRIBD about this case. They are:

1) Judge Redman, Clackamas County Circuit Court Judge, Pro Tem September 30, 2008, decision
2) Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
3) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Webhosts
4) Third-party The Portland Mercury’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
5) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
6) Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum

Re: 2007 ORS 44.510 et seq.

Published on:

By

I don’t get too many opportunities to work through my “what I want to learn today” list (my LinkedIn site is languishing – sigh), but 12/18/08 was a SCRIBD day (or more accuately, a SCRIBD 30 minutes) (I really just like saying SCRIBD, SCRIBD, SCRIBD 🙂

In honor of SCRIBD Day, I posted 2 documents that took me a long time to get into my hot, little, grasping, law librarian hands (with the help of several others, including the Clackamas County Law Librarian and the San Bernardino County Law Librarian and their wonderful staff members, who are all just as pigheaded as I am when it comes to finding elusive documents).

I’ve uploaded Doe v. TS, RONALD, KRIS, and Bill, Case no. CV 0803 0693 (and supporting documents) and Ayyoub v. City of Oakland, Determination on Appeal from the (California) State Labor Commissioners, Case no. 99-02937 (by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations).

Contact Information